Content | Title | Category | Project type | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024-07-04 | (Română) Responsabilizarea sectorului justiției din Moldova | Expertise, Information and advice, Legislation, Monitoring | Current project | ||
2024-07-04 | (Română) Sensibilizarea publicului și dezvoltarea soluțiilor digitale în vederea consolidării statului de drept și a luptei anticorupție | Information and advice, Monitoring | Project implemented | ||
2024-07-04 | (Română) Creșterea transparenței, responsabilității și accesului la sistemul judiciar | Monitoring | Project implemented | ||
2024-07-04 | (Română) Recuperarea activelor din corupție în Moldova | Expertise, Monitoring | Project implemented | ||
2024-07-04 | (Română) Preparatory Support (pre core-support) to the CAPC | Expertise, Information and advice | Project implemented | ||
2024-07-04 | (Română) Cetățenii vorbesc: promovarea reformei democratice în interesul cetățenilor din Moldova | Expertise, Information and advice | Project implemented | ||
2024-07-04 | (Română) Consolidarea integrității publice în Republica Moldova | Expertise, Information and advice | Project implemented | ||
2024-07-04 | (Română) Litigare strategică pentru asigurarea integrității aleșilor poporului | Information and advice, Monitoring | Project implemented | ||
2024-07-04 | (Română) Sprijin pentru prevenirea și combaterea eficientă a corupției în sectorul justiției în Moldova | Project implemented | |||
2024-07-04 | (Română) Responsabilizarea sectorului justiției din Moldova | Expertise, Information and advice, Legislation, Monitoring | Current project | ||
2011-11-01 | Corruption proofing - stage 5 | Expertise, Information and advice | Project implemented | ||
2010-10-19 | (Română) Suport informaţional Autorităţilor Publice Locale (APL) în elaborarea actelor normative locale | Information and advice, Legislation | Project implemented | ||
2015-04-01 | (Română) Promovarea măsurilor restaurative în cauzele de corupţie | Information and advice | Project implemented | ||
2008-07-01 | In July 2008, with the financial support of the Swedish Helsinki Committee for Human Rights, CAPC launched the "Anti-Corruption Awareness Raising through Radio Shows" Project. The project lasted until December 2008 and provided for production of a series of 23 shows entitled "Corruption Free Zone", implemented in cooperation with Radio Noroc. Between 1 July and 10 September 2008 the first 12 shows were broadcasted, each Monday and each Wednesday, then these shows were broadcasted each Wednesday, between 19.00-20.00. Project Overall Objective: Educating intolerance of the general public towards corruption through involvement of the media and of the public officials in raising awareness about the human rights of the corruption victims and granting free legal assistance to them. Specific Objectives which will contribute to the achievement of the overall objective are:
Every radio show was attended by the CAPC lawyers and by the representatives of public authorities. The radio shows discussed various aspects of the topics addressed and replies were given to the written messages sent by listeners during the show. Throughout the show, listeners were able to call the CAPC hotline to denounce violations they knew and which were related to the topic of the show.
Shows made08 2008
Corupţia în învăţămînt afectează dreptul la educaţie? Bacalaureatul şi admiterea 2008. Noua Lege anticorupţie va schimba ceva? Corupţia poate afecta dreptul la libera circulaţie? Taxele ilegale colectate de şoferii rutelor internaţionale cu pretextul facilitării trecerii în vamă. Corupţia în rîndurile poliţiei afectează dreptul la securitate individuală? Corupţia afectează dreptul la un proces echitabil? Neexecutarea hotărîrilor judecătoreşti generează mecanisme corupţionale. Corupţia în administraţia publică locală împiedică soluţionarea problemelor cetăţenilor. 09 2008Corupţia afectează libertatea asocierii şi dreptul la învăţămînt gratuit? Contribuţiile forţate prin intermediul asociaţiilor părinteşti şi fundaţiilor. Dreptul la muncă poate fi afectat de corupţie? Noua lege a securităţii şi sănătăţii în muncă. Ce este conflictul de interese şi de ce trebuie acesta reglementat special? Corupţia în administraţia publică locală Corupţia în vamă Declararea veniturilor şi averilor funcţionarilor este o modalitate eficientă de prevenire şi combatere a corupţiei în Republica Moldova? 10 2008Corupţia în rîndurile poliţiei rutiere Plăţile neoficiale în învăţămînt Corupţia cumpără grade de invaliditate? Noua lege a protecţiei martorilor asigură garanţii suficiente pentru protecţia celor care denunţă fapte de corupţie? Corupţia generată de sistemul asigurărilor medicale obligatorii 11 2008Corupţia generată de sistemul asigurărilor medicale obligatorii – continuare Prevenirea corupţiei Corupţia în universităţi Corupţia în rîndul avocaţilor: mit sau realitate?
| Radio broadcasts "Corruption free zone" | Information and advice | Project implemented | |
2006-03-01 | The project „Decreasing of the corruption level through civil society implication in the legislative creation process” (Corruption proofing – stage 1) was implemented in the period of March 2006 – October 2006 with the financial support of the Eurasia Foundation through financial resources given by USAID. The Project Mission was to decrease the corruption level through the involvement of the civil society in the legislative drafting process and creation of the preconditions necessary to set up an institution (representative of the civil society) to monitor on a permanent basis the legislative drafting process, for the purpose of excluding the legal provisions favouring corruption. The Project started with the following preparatory activities:
After the described preparatory activities, the direct corruption proofing expert review of the draft legislation was launched. 79 draft legal acts were subjected to corruption proofing expert review (see the expert review reports no. 001-079). | Corruption expertise - stage 1 | Expertise | Project implemented | |
2015-05-01 | (Română) Consolidarea eforturilor societăţii civile de monitorizare a reformei sectorului justiţiei | Monitoring | Project implemented | ||
2006-10-01 | The Corruption Proofing Project (stage 2) was a follow-up of the pilot project the “Decreasing the level of corruption through civil society involvement in the legislative process" (corruption proofing - stage 1) and was implemented by CAPC from 1 October 2006 to 1 October 2007 under the Joint Project of the Council of Europe and European Commission against Corruption, Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing in the Republic of Moldova (MOLICO), co-financed by European Commission, Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency and the Council of Europe. The following activities were implemented under this project:
| Corruption expertise - stage 2 | Expertise | Project implemented | |
2015-09-01 | (Română) EXPERTIZA CORUPTIBILITĂŢII PROIECTELOR ACTELOR LEGISLATIVE | Expertise, Legislation | Project implemented | ||
2008-04-19 | "Corruption Proofing" Project is implemented by the Centre for the Analysis and Prevention of Corruption (CAPC) within the framework of the Joint Project of the European Commission and the Council of Europe against corruption, money laundering and terrorist financing in the Republic of Moldova (MOLICO), co-financed by the European Commission, the Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency (SIDA) and the Council of Europe.
The contents of this publication are the sole responsibility of the CAPC experts and can in no way be taken to reflect the official opinion of the European Union, SIDA and the Council of Europe. The Project „Corruption Proofing of the Draft Legislative Acts and Dissemination of Best Practices”, is envisaged to last throughout the period of April 2008 – January 2009 (hereinafter referred to as „Corruption Proofing – stage 3”) is a follow-up to the Project „Corruption Proofing – stage 2”, implemented in the period October 1, 2006 – October 1, 2007. Project Mission: Promotion of the Corruption Proofing Methodology and advancing the CAPC and CCECC corruption proofing best practices. The Project was carried out in the framework of the Joint Project of Council of Europe and European Commission against Corruption, Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing in the Republic of Moldova (MOLICO), co-financed by European Commission, Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency and Council of Europe, supporting a series of activities divided in 4 Modules: Module I. Joint CAPC and CCECC training of the central and local public authorities on corruption proofing of draft legislation and draft regulatory acts of the Government Module II. Promotion of the corruption proofing methodology as best practice in preventing corruption Module III. Supporting the legislative process by submission of corruption proofing expert reports on draft laws of the Parliament Module IV. Developing an electronic template to facilitate the writing of the corruption proofing expert reports and subsequently transferring it to the CCECC "Corruption Proofing" Project is implemented by the Centre for the Analysis and Prevention of Corruption (CAPC) within the framework of the Joint Project of the European Commission and the Council of Europe against corruption, money laundering and terrorist financing in the Republic of Moldova (MOLICO), co-financed by the European Commission, the Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency (SIDA) and the Council of Europe.
The contents of this publication are the sole responsibility of the CAPC experts and can in no way be taken to reflect the official opinion of the European Union, SIDA and the Council of Europe. The training sessions “Corruption proofing of the draft regulatory acts” in the districts of were envisaged to be carried out in 8 Southern regions of the Republic of Moldova. Training Objectives
Target audience Expected Outputs:
Training Contents:
"Corruption Proofing" Project is implemented by the Centre for the Analysis and Prevention of Corruption (CAPC) within the framework of the Joint Project of the European Commission and the Council of Europe against corruption, money laundering and terrorist financing in the Republic of Moldova (MOLICO), co-financed by the European Commission, the Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency (SIDA) and the Council of Europe.
The contents of this publication are the sole responsibility of the CAPC experts and can in no way be taken to reflect the official opinion of the European Union, SIDA and the Council of Europe. The methodology for corruption proofing of draft laws (hereinafter referred to as Methodology) was developed to establish procedures and mechanisms for expert review of corruptibility of the draft legislation. The expert review of corruptibility of draft legal acts carried out by independent experts, serves as a contribution of the civil society to the establishment of a modern legal framework compliant with the European legal framework. The Contribution of the Centre for Analysis and Prevention of Corruption (CAPC) is put into value in accordance with the Concept Paper for Cooperation between the Parliament and the civil society, approved by the Parliament Decision No. 373-XVI of 29 December 2005. See the text of the Methodology. "Corruption Proofing" Project is implemented by the Centre for the Analysis and Prevention of Corruption (CAPC) within the framework of the Joint Project of the European Commission and the Council of Europe against corruption, money laundering and terrorist financing in the Republic of Moldova (MOLICO), co-financed by the European Commission, the Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency (SIDA) and the Council of Europe. "Corruption Proofing" Project is implemented by the Centre for the Analysis and Prevention of Corruption (CAPC) within the framework of the Joint Project of the European Commission and the Council of Europe against corruption, money laundering and terrorist financing in the Republic of Moldova (MOLICO), co-financed by the European Commission, the Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency (SIDA) and the Council of Europe.
The contents of this publication are the sole responsibility of the CAPC experts and can in no way be taken to reflect the official opinion of the European Union, SIDA and the Council of Europe. "Guide on corruptibility expert review of draft legislative and other regulatory acts" (hereinafter referred as “the Guide”) was developed by the CAPC in December 2006 and was assessed by the Council of Europe experts. The Guide aims to contribute to the activity of preparing the expert review reports to identify the legal norms with risks of favouring corruption, being a legal-theoretical basis for the activity of corruption proofing of draft legislative acts. This document is useful also for the process of legal and regulatory acts’ drafting, as it provides information about the normative constructions and omissions generating negative effects. This Guide was drafted in accordance with the provisions of the Law No.780-XV of 27.12.2001 on legislative acts and the Law No.317-XV of 18.07.2003 on the regulatory acts of the Government and of other authorities of public and local administration, being also the first ample methodology for corruption proofing of the draft legislative and regulatory acts. Publication available in Romanian (revised and updated version), Russian and English (initial versions) languages "Corruption Proofing" Project is implemented by the Centre for the Analysis and Prevention of Corruption (CAPC) within the framework of the Joint Project of the European Commission and the Council of Europe against corruption, money laundering and terrorist financing in the Republic of Moldova (MOLICO), co-financed by the European Commission, the Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency (SIDA) and the Council of Europe.
The contents of this publication are the sole responsibility of the CAPC experts and can in no way be taken to reflect the official opinion of the European Union, SIDA and the Council of Europe. Nagacevschi Vitalie Lawyer, attorney, President of the NGO "Lawyers for Human Rights”, member of the Board of the Lawyers’ Union of Moldova. Professional experience in prosecution, Ministry of Justice. Co-author of the report on compatibility of Moldovan legislation with the requirements of the European Convention on Human Rights, the draft law on refugees, the draft law on prosecution. Gurin Corneliu Lawyer. Professional experience within the Parliament Office, holder of the highest degree of qualification in public service. Co-author of the Law on legislative acts, the Electoral Code, the General classifier of legislation of the Republic of Moldova, the Law on procedure of repairing the damage caused by unlawful actions of the criminal investigation and preliminary investigation authorities, the prosecution authorities and the courts; Law on the status of refugees, the Consumer Co-operative Law, Law on the manufacture and circulation of ethyl alcohol and alcoholic products, numerous draft legal acts and legal expertise. Co-author of some publications in the field of constitutional law, fundamental rights and freedoms. Rusu Eugen Lawyer. Professional experience in prosecution. Former Member of Parliament (legislatures XIII and XIV), chair of the Legal committee for appointments and immunities of the Parliament of Moldova. Member of the Committee for Combating Trafficking in Human Beings. Member of the Working Group for promotion of reforms of the juvenile justice system. Mirza Veaceslav Master of Law, national expert of the Institute for Penal Reform, the EU-UNDP BUMAD programme . Professional experience in public sector (The Office of the President of the Republic of Moldova) and private sector. Author and co-author of many draft laws and by-laws (draft Enforcement Code (Book II), draft Administrative Offence Code, member of working groups for finalization of the Code of Criminal Procedure, the Criminal Code, improvement of justice efficiency, etc.). Experience in the expertise of legal acts in terms of constitutionality, compliance with the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms and the European Community legislation. Rosca Nicolae Doctor of Law, Associate Professor, attorney. Member of the Commission for licensing notary activities and the and Commission for licensing of attorneys. Co-author of the draft law on real estate cadastre; draft Law on licensing; draft Law on Condominium, the draft law on the protection of small entrepreneurs, the draft law on limited liability company, the draft law on non-profit organizations; the draft Civil Code. Author of numerous publications on business law and civil law. Baes Sergiu Doctor of Law, Associate Professor, attorney. Chair of the Commission for licensing of attorneys. Arbitrator in the Court of Arbitration at the Chamber of Commerce and Industry of the Republic of Moldova and the Romanian Association of Commercial Arbitration. Co-author of the draft law on real estate cadastre, the draft law on limited liability company, the draft Civil Code, the draft law on non-profit organizations. Author of numerous publications in the field of civil law and business law. Pagoni Domnita Lawyer, doctoral student, senior university lecturer. Professional experience in private sector. Co-author of the draft Civil Code. Author of a large number of publications in the field of civil law. Jigau Radu Lawyer, university lecturer, industrial property adviser. Professional experience in private sector. Armeanic Alexandru Doctor of Law, Associate Professor, Head of Department at AESM. Professional experience in the Ministry of Justice and the Office of the President of the Republic of Moldova. Author of an impressive number of publications in the field of taxation and finance. Ermurachi Victor Master of Law, university lecturer, attorney. Member of Board of the Fund for guaranteeing deposits in the banking system. Professional experience in private sector. Cojocaru Cristina Lawyer. Master of private law. Teaching experience as a lecturer at the English-speaking division of the Law Department of MSU. Professional experience in the EU-supported Project “Civil and Commercial Judiciary" in Moldova, the U.S. Embassy in Moldova and the Centre for Analysis and Prevention of Corruption. Co-author of publications in preventing and combating trafficking in human beings and justice. Meresevschi Vladislav Licentiate of history and law. Professional experience in pre-university education and local public administration. Marian Silvia Doctor of Law, Licentiate of economics, Associate Professor. Professional experience in Administration of AESM, higher education and private sector. Represented AESM in civil and criminal cases in the courts; Territorial Cadastral Office, Ministry of Justice, State Registration Chamber of the Department of Information Technology, Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports, etc. Author of publications in the field of civil law, land law, business law, labour law, tax law. Apostol Lilian Lawyer. Lecturer at the Centre for retraining of the prosecution staff. Professional experience in prosecution. "Corruption Proofing" Project is implemented by the Centre for the Analysis and Prevention of Corruption (CAPC) within the framework of the Joint Project of the European Commission and the Council of Europe against corruption, money laundering and terrorist financing in the Republic of Moldova (MOLICO), co-financed by the European Commission, the Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency (SIDA) and the Council of Europe.
The contents of this publication are the sole responsibility of the CAPC experts and can in no way be taken to reflect the official opinion of the European Union, SIDA and the Council of Europe. In October 2007, CAPC released the "Effectiveness of the Corruption Proofing Mechanism Study" (hereinafter referred to as" Study "). The Goal of the Study is to identify the effectiveness of the mechanism for corruption proofing of the draft legislation. A summary of the main findings of the study is presented below. In the period of October 2006 – October 2007 CAPC put under corruption proofing expertise a total of 202 draft legislative acts placed on the website of the Parliament. In their reports, the CAPC experts formulated objections about 2256 elements found in the drafts subjected to expertise. Upon writing of this study 117 of 202 draft laws put under expertise were passed by the Parliament and published in the Official Gazette.
| Corruption expertise - stage 3 | Expertise | Project implemented | |
2009-07-09 | "Corruption Proofing" is implemented by the Centre for the Analysis and Prevention of Corruption (CAPC) within the framework of "Corruption Proofing of Draft Legislative Acts – Phase IV" project supported by the Civil Rights Defenders and Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency (SIDA). The Project “Corruption Proofing of Draft Legislative Acts – Phase IV” is envisaged to last throughout the period of July 2009 – December 2009 (hereinafter referred to as „Project” Proofing – stage 3”) is a follow-up to the „Corruption Proofing of the Draft Legislative Acts and Dissemination of Best Practices”, implemented in the period April 2008 – December 2008. Project Overall Objective: Prevent corruption to spread in Moldova through passing of defective laws, increase transparency and accountability of the legislator towards voters, empower the legal community and civil society to exercise public control over the legislative process, and enhance the access of the people to diverse and balanced information about the stakes of the emerging legislation. The Project financed by Civil Rights Defenders and Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency. Project Objective:
Project objectives will be achieved by conducting the following activities: I. Corruption proofing expert opinions – CAPC will continue corruption proofing of draft legislative acts registered in the Parliament and of draft regulatory acts on express request of certain authorities, with subsequent submission of survey reports to Parliament and the requesting authorities. II. Designing an on-line database for the monitoring of the legislative activism of each member of the Parliament - Substantiated data included in articles and other references regarding the activity of politicians / political parties represented in Parliament, through journalists’ and other stakeholders’ using the information from the CAPC database on legislative activism of deputies III. Corruption proofing forum – Interested members of the legal community and civil society informed about the risks of the upcoming legislation, engaged in public discussions about them on the Corruption Proofing Forum and better prepared to approach the subject in further discussions with public authorities in charge. IV. Information of the public about emerging laws – Public empowered to face the new legislative changes and/or having enough time to protest against the promotion of laws unfavourable to its interests, as well as public aware of the quality of the laws promoted by elected political parties. "Corruption Proofing" is implemented by the Centre for the Analysis and Prevention of Corruption (CAPC) within the framework of "Corruption Proofing of Draft Legislative Acts – Phase IV" project supported by the Civil Rights Defenders and Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency (SIDA). Considering the vivid interest of the journalists in the particular activity of each member of parliament (especially in the electoral campaign period, when the journalists had to portray the profile of all the former deputies running in the new elections), it was found useful to develop a data-base available on-line to the journalists and public, in which information about the legislative activity of all deputies will be introduced in a systematic basis. Thus, the database will make possible to identify the deputies:
In general, the emphasis of this project is to be working more with the journalists and increase public awareness of the legislative process, as it is directly linked to political processes occurring in the country, as opposed to the previous approach of working almost exclusively with the lawyers. The database is a new component, which we believe will catch the attention of the journalists, as it will become a valuable source of information for their articles. "Corruption Proofing" is implemented by the Centre for the Analysis and Prevention of Corruption (CAPC) within the framework of "Corruption Proofing of Draft Legislative Acts – Phase IV" project supported by the Civil Rights Defenders and Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency (SIDA). During the project "Corruption Proofing of Draft Legislative Acts – Phase IV" CAPC launches a new product to coverage and to disseminate the information on activities of corruption proofing. This component involves the development and distribution of a periodic Digest (newsletter) in electronic form containing information on:
Digest will be sent to the following categories of beneficiaries:
Access to information published in the Digest legislative debates anticorruption will be done by subscribing to applicants. Newsletters (Digest) will be prepared and distributed depending on the number of draft legislative acts and variety of areas involved in these projects. People that will ask Digest subscription will have the option to select areas that are of interest to their work. "Corruption Proofing" is implemented by the Centre for the Analysis and Prevention of Corruption (CAPC) within the framework of "Corruption Proofing of Draft Legislative Acts – Phase IV" project supported by the Civil Rights Defenders and Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency (SIDA). An on-line forum on corruption proofing (hereinafter referred to as Forum) was launched in order to disseminate best practices and to improve corruption proofing, to ensure better visibility and broader publicity of the CAPC corruption proofing activity. The Forum includes three topics for discussion, and namely:
| Corruption proofing - stage 4 | Expertise, Information and advice | Project implemented | |
2008-01-01 | From January 2008 to February 2009 the Centre for Analysis and Prevention of Corruption (CAPC) has implemented the project “Monitoring the Implementation of Chapter V of the Threshold Country Plan (TCP) by the Centre for Combating Economic Crime and Corruption (CCECC)”. The project monitors actions aimed at improving the operation of the Centre for Combating Economic Crime and Corruption. This activity represents one of the priorities of the Threshold Country Plan (TCP) – Strengthening Civil Society Monitoring Capacity in Moldova (SCSMCM). The goal of the monitoring activity consists in objective assessment of transparency and capacity of the Centre for Combating Economic Crime and Corruption to prevent and combat corruption and to come up with legal and institutional solutions and recommendations that would improve the governance. Through this monitoring activity, CAPC intends to assess the quality of TCP implementation. The monitoring process is run according to the Methodology for monitoring of progress and real impact of anti-corruption policies from the perspective of implementation of the Threshold Country Plan of he Republic of Moldova under the US “Millennium Challenge” programme and of the Government Decision no. 32 dated 11.01.2007, by the Centre for Combating Economic Crime and Corruption. The monitoring results are presented in the CAPC monthly and quarterly reports. See the text of Methodology. The Strengthening Civil Society Monitoring Capacity in Moldova programme that covers monitoring activities is financed by the Millennium Challenge Corporation (MCC) and administered by the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) within the Threshold Country Plan for Moldova (TCP). The SCSMCM programme has been implemented by the Academy for Educational Development (AED) in the period July 2007 – March 2009. This activity became possible due to support of the Academy for Educational Development (AED) under the SCSMCM programme, based on the cooperation agreement with the United States Agency for International Development (USAID). Summary of the CCECC monitoring report for quarter I, 2008The findings presented below serve as benchmarks (concepts for comparison of situation) for further monitoring. The comments presented below refer to the following: 1. CCECC actions in line with TCP and GD 32 that did not reach the deadline. Actions foreseen in GD 32 I.6-I.23, II.24-II.26, II.28-II.32 and III.33-III.38 did not reach the deadline; however we should note the earlier implementation by CCECC of the following actions:
2. CCECC actions in line with TCP and GD 32 that reached the deadline. Among actions that reached the deadline were the following:
Although it did not reach the deadline, the implementation of activities “1.6 Development of regulations on the composition, goals, responsibilities, status of civil society representative group and establishment of mechanisms to ensure its independence” and “1.7 Training for the preparation of civil society representative group to ensure the transparency of its activity, establish and promote hotlines, formulate recommendations to the CCECC management”, will face the same conceptual problem, as mentioned above, referring to measure I.5. Summary of the CCECC monitoring report for quarter II, 2008While finalizing the monitoring of implementation of TCP and GD 32 in quarter II of 2008, it was noted that out of the total number of actions (38), CCECC has already implemented 10, and 2 were carried out partially. One action has not been implemented yet due to reasons independent from CCECC. The remaining 26 actions have not reached their deadlines by the end of quarter II and are still ongoing. Concerning the availability, relevance, efficiency and effectiveness of anti-corruption measures aimed at the implementation of GD 32, it can be stated that:
Summary of the CCECC monitoring report for quarter III, 2008While finalizing the monitoring of implementation of TCP and GD 32 in quarter III of 2008, it was noted that out of the total number of actions (38), CCECC has already implemented 13 actions, and 3 actions were partially implemented. The remaining 22 actions have not reached their deadlines by the end of quarter III, and are still ongoing. Concerning the availability, relevance, effectiveness and efficiency of anticorruption measures directed at the implementation of GD no.32, it was noted that:
Summary of the CCECC monitoring report for quarter IV, 2008 | CCECC monitoring | Monitoring | Project implemented | |
2007-06-01 | 92-79-79 is a line that has been active since 1 June 2007, which can be called by people who are informed of a case of corruption to get free legal advice. This anti-corruption hotline has been active from 1 June 2007 to 31 December 2009, Monday through Friday, from 9.00 to 21.00, when it is attended by four lawyers/operators, who provide free consultations by phone. Also, lawyers employed by the project offer the option of referral of cases to law enforcement authorities or, if citizens do not trust authorities, these cases can be sent for investigation to journalists, with the consent of the informant. To ensure the highest quality of journalists’ work, the seminar "Legal dimension of journalistic investigations of corruption cases" was organized in the period 30 May - 1 June 2007. It was attended by 15 representatives of the media. The trainers were representatives of Law enforcement authorities, the Centre for Combating Economic Crime and Corruption, Anti-Corruption Prosecutor’s Office, General Prosecutor’s Office and Ministry of Interior. Subsequently, the seminar was repeated three times in September 2008, for a total number of 80 journalists, including those from rayons and Russian-speaking people. Within the project „Anti-Corruption Public Awareness Campaign” co-operation was established with the newspaper „Ziarul de Garda”, to which the hotline operators/lawyers, with the agreement of the petitioners, referred relevant cases for journalistic investigations. The journalists and hotline operators worked as a team, so that, before publication, the ready articles were reviewed by operators/lawyers responsible for a certain case, in order to ensure correctness of legal terminology used by journalists or to make additional comments. As a result of this co-operation, a number of articles were published. The titles and summaries at the beginning of articles published in the period March 2007 - March 2008 are presented below:
Pe de o parte, «PCRM foloseşte măciuca puterii pentru a distruge opoziţia», pe de alta — «Procuratura consideră un eşec orice dosar pierdut în instanţele naţionale», consideră edilii inculpaţi. On 26 March 2008 the Centre for Analysis and Prevention of Corruption presented the Report "Citizens Calling the Anti-Corruption Hot-Line: Need Civic Responsibility or… Courage?" The report makes an analysis of telephone calls registered at the anti-corruption hotline 92-79-79, during the period 1 June 2007 - 29 February 2008. Further the main findings are presented. During 9 months of hotline operation, 914 persons benefited from free legal advice. Only 16% of people that called the hotline reported information that could be related to an alleged act of corruption, other 84% reported actions that they confused with acts of corruption, which accounts for people’s erroneous perception of this phenomena. The most frequent corruption acts communicated though the hotline 92-79-79 were related to such sectors as education (30%), police (20%), local public authorities (13%) and health care (12%). Out of the total number of complaints about corruption acts, 90% were registered in public sector and 10% referred to corruption in private sector. At the same time, the majority of informants reported a feeling of fear regarding the authorities and the possibility to cooperate with them. The operation of the hotline within the Centre for Analysis and Prevention of Corruption demonstrated that the population: 1) does not know and does not understand what corruption is, and 2) is afraid to report the alleged corruption cases and in general to communicate directly with public authorities. Publication available only in Romanian language | Hot line | Information and advice | Project implemented | |
2005-10-01 | The goal of the project implemented by CAPC was advocacy among parliamentarians, party leaders and other political actors in the Republic of Moldova for a better promotion, protection and respect for human rights. Project objectives:
Project implementation. Since 18 October 2005 (during 3 months), at a prime time (08.30), during the public policy programme broadcasted at Radio Nova – “Waking up in the morning”, radio debates were conducted with the participation of parliamentarians, party leaders and other political actors in Moldova. At the same time, representatives of civil society, working in the relevant field were invited as experts. These radio shows discussed and analyzed the main problems related to the promotion, protection, development and enforcement of human rights policies. Live shows gave the listeners an opportunity to share their own views in the radio debate. To advertise as largely as possible the policies related to the promotion, protection, development and respect for human rights, the transcript of the radio debate was published every Friday in the weekly newspaper which has a national coverage - "Saptamina" and on the CAPC website. 15 radio shows have been organized during project implementation with the following Members of the Parliament of the Republic of Moldova: Dumitru Diacov, Dumitru Braghis, Gheorghe Susarenco, Serafim Urecheanu, Lidia Gutu, Vitalia Pavlicenco, Valentina Holban, Veaceslav Untila. The shows were also attended by: Professor Anatol Gremalschi, Programme Manager, Institute for Public Policy; Nicolae Andronic, President of the Republican People's Party, Mihail Gh.Ciubotaru, writer, ex-Minister of Culture; Anghel Agache, President of the forum "New Moldova", Mircea Esanu, President of the National Centre for transparency and human rights; Ecaterina Mardarovici, President of the Political Women’s Club; as well as lawyers: Vitalie Nagacevschi, Alexandru Tanase, Ion Vizdoaga; Stefan Uritu, President of the Helsinki Committee for Human Rights in Moldova, Mihai Petrache, President of the Centrist Union, expert in constitutional law; doctor Valeriu Sava, the author of the Law on the patients’ rights and responsibilities. The series of radio shows "Human rights are your rights" were produced with the financial support of the UNDP Moldova Project "Support to the implementation of the National Human Rights Action Plan in Moldova". | Radio broadcasts "Human rights are your rights" | Information and advice | Project implemented | |
2014-01-01 | (Română) Expertiza proiectelor de acte normative prin prisma drepturilor omului | Expertise | Project implemented | ||
2011-01-19 | Through the implementation of the project "Social Campaign: I do not give - I do not take!", Centre for Analysis and Prevention of Corruption (CAPC), Center for Combating Economic Crimes and Corruption of the Republic of Moldova (CCECC) and Publika TV (broadcasting channel) will organise a series of TV programmes (10 programmes), during which will be discussed such topics as current problems which society have to deal with, that shall contribute to the improvement of the level of information of the population, on raising awareness against the tolerance of such phenomenon as corruption and as a result will lead to the respect for human rights. The overall goal of the campaign is to link Moldavian citizen with their governmental institutions by increasing citizen trust, transparency and openness of the decision making process. The increased social trust and government transparency will ultimately contribute to the decrease of corruption level in the country to the extent that the infringement of the human rights and freedoms are minimal or non-existent. Providing the endemic character of corruption problem, the only way forwards to bringing citizen closer to their government is to fight corruption by both decreasing outside and inside pressure.
The objective is to mobilize individual citizens and civil society actors to effectively address corruption, monitor, advocate, and evaluate government’s efforts thus building a bridge between and mutual trust between citizens and their state institutions. The Social Campaign: I do not give - I do nor take! is financial supported by The Balkan Trust for Democracy. EMISIUNEA 1 – 13.09.2011 Corupţia în organele de drept:cine ne apară? (talk-show-ul în limba rusă „День за днем”) Subiecte in discuţie: Ce este corupţia? Participanţii la emisiune: Galina Bostan, presedinte CAPC Subiectul integral, îl puteţi urmări pe site-ul PublikaTV: http://www.publika.md/------------------------coruptia-in-organele-de-drept--cine-ne-apara_487801.html EMISIUNEA 2 – 15.09.2011 Scoaterea copiilor din ţară. (talk-show-ul în limba română „Ţara lui Dogaru”) Subiecte in discuţie: Problemele oamenilor plecaţi peste hotare. Copiii – victime ale problemelor economice şi personale ale părinţilor. Participanţii la emisiune: Domniţa Pagoni, expert CAPC Daniela Răilean, inspector principal, CCCEC Angela Ganea, şef al secţiei reîntregirea familiei şi adopţiei, Direcţia principală protecţia copilului, Primăria mun. Chişinău Alexandru Donici, şef adjunct al Direcţiei Documentare a populaţiei, Ministerul Tehnologiei Informaţiei şi Comunicaţiilor Subiectul integral, îl puteţi urmări pe site-ul PublikaTV:http://www.publika.md/tara-lui-dogaru--scoaterea-copiilor-din-tara_487881.html EMISIUNEA 3 – 20.09.2011 Asigurările medicale: Asistenţă medicală gratuită sau durere „garantată” de cap? (talk-show-ul în limba rusă „День за днем”) Subiecte in discuţie: Care sunt serviciile medicale garantate de poliţa de asigurare? Care sunt rezultatele palpabile ale CNAM? Oportunitatea introducerii unui sistem mixt de asigurare în medicină, inclusiv de acumulare a mijloacelor financiare a plătitorului. Participanţii la emisiune: Mariana Kalughin, expert CAPC Iurii Osoianu, director general adjunct al Companiei Naţionale de Asigurări în Medicină Tatiana Zatîri, şef direcţie politici ajutor medical, Ministerul Sănătăţii Subiectul integral, îl puteţi urmări pe site-ul PublikaTV:http://www.publika.md/------------------------asigurarile-medicale---asistenta-medicala-gratuita-sau-durere-garantata-de-cap_487851.html EMISIUNEA 4 – 22.09.2011 Cine sunt „provocatorii” actelor de corupţie (talk-show-ul în limba română „Ţara lui Dogaru”) Subiecte in discuţie: Cum poate fi intentat un dosar penal pentru corupţie? Provocarea – o probă? Participanţii la emisiune: Galina Bostan, presedinte CAPC Vitalie Budeci, avocat, profesor drept penal Anatol Donciu, avocat, profesor drept procesual penal Subiectul integral, îl puteţi urmări pe site-ul PublikaTV:http://www.publika.md/tara-lui-dogaru--cum-se-pedepsesc-provocatorii-actelor-de-coruptie_488761.html EMISIUNEA 5 – 27.09.2011 Asigurările sociale: tinereţe scumpă şi bătrâneţe în sărăcie (talk-show-ul în limba rusă „ДЕНЬ ЗА ДНЕМ”) Subiecte in discuţie: Cum sunt cheltuiţi banii din fondul social? Cum putem să ne asigurăm, că plătind sume mari în fondul social vom beneficia şi de o pensie decentă? Participanţii la emisiune: Mariana Kalughin, expert CAPC Tatiana Mostovei, inspector principal al Directiei prevenire si analitica criminogena, CCCEC Laura Grecu, şef direcţie politici de asigurări sociale, Ministerul Muncii şi Protecţiei Sociale Subiectul integral, îl puteţi urmări pe site-ul PublikaTV: http://www.publika.md/------------------------asigurarile-sociale--tinerete-scumpa-si-batranete-in-saracie_495651.html EMISIUNEA 6 – 29.09.2011 Relaţia dintre funcţionarii publici şi cetăţenii simpli - Unii cer, alţii dau. (talk-show-ul în limba română „Ţara lui Dogaru”) Subiecte in discuţie: Constituie o contravenţie nu numai faptul de a cere/lua mită, dar şi a da mită. Ce prevede legislaţia în aceste cazuri? Problema autorizaţiilor de construcţie. Participanţii la emisiune: Domniţa Pagoni, expert CAPC Gheorghe Raileanu, sef direcţie autorizare si disciplina in construcţii, Anatol Zolotcov, viceministru al construcţiilor EMISIUNEA 7 – 04.10.2011 Corupţia şi procesul de înfăptuire a justiţiei (talk-show-ul în limba rusă „ДЕНЬ ЗА ДНЕМ”) Subiecte in discuţie: Asigurarea materială a judecătorilor. Numirea şi promovarea judecătorilor. Comportamentul părţilor în proces. Ineficienţa legilor. Numărul mare de dosare aflate pe rol în instanţele de judecată. Participanţii la emisiune: Galina Bostan, preşedinte CAPC Nicolae Esanu, ex-viceministru al justiţiei Ion Dron, preşedintele Centrului de Iniţiative şi Monitoring al Autoritarilor Publice, avocat Subiectul integral, îl puteţi urmări pe site-ul PublikaTV: http://www.publika.md/------------------------coruptia-din-sistemul-judecatoresc_509471.html EMISIUNEA 8 – 06.10.2011 Vama – “drumul de aur”? (talk-show-ul în limba română „Ţara lui Dogaru”) Subiecte in discuţie: Cazuri de contrabandă se înregistrează mai des, şi totuşi, vameşii români înregistrează mult mai multe cazuri. Cum dispare contrabanda pe teritoriul Moldovei? Participanţii la emisiune: Radu Jigău, expert CAPC Iurie Ceban, Director Departament, Serviciul Vamal Subiectul integral, îl puteţi urmări pe site-ul PublikaTV: http://www.publika.md/tara-lui-dogaru-vama-prin-care-treci-cu-bani_509781.html EMISIUNEA 9 – 11.10.2011 Învăţăm corupţia de la grădiniţă sau cât ne costă învăţământul gratuit (talk-show-ul în limba rusă „ДЕНЬ ЗА ДНЕМ”) Subiecte in discuţie: Care sunt costurile instruirii suportate de părinţii copiilor? Asociaţiile părinteşti. Cum sunt cheltuiţi banii Asociaţiei. Există o transparenţă a cheltuielilor? De ce nivelul pregătirii elevilor este tot mai slab? Participanţii la emisiune: Stela Pavlov, expert CAPC Viorica Pelivan, metodist, Direcţia generala de învăţămînt, Primăria mun. Chişinău Valentin Crudu, sef direcţie învăţămînt preuniversitar, Ministerul Educaţiei Subiectul integral, îl puteţi urmări pe site-ul PublikaTV: http://www.publika.md/------------------------invatamant-gratuit-in-legislatie--dar-cu-bani-in-salile-de-clasa_516091.html EMISIUNEA 10 – 13.10.2011 Corupţie în poliţie (talk-show-ul în limba română „Ţara lui Dogaru”) Subiecte in discuţie: Banii fac să dispară orice probleme cu legea. Nivelul încrederii în organele de drept. Participanţii la emisiune: Galina Bostan, preşedinte CAPC Mihai Lupu, avocat Viorel Morari, Procuror adjunct, Procuratura anticorupţie Subiectul integral, îl puteţi urmări pe site-ul PublikaTV:http://www.publika.md/tara-lui-dogaru--institutiile-de-drept-si-coruptia_519581.html
| Social campaign "I do not give, I do not take" | Information and advice | Project implemented | |
2005-02-14 | From 14 February 2005 to 6 March 2005, the Election Day, legal advisers of the Centre for Analysis and Prevention of Corruption (CAPC) granted free legal assistance in election-related issues. Free legal assistance was granted to voters, journalists, NGOs and consisted of:
7 hotlines were organized throughout project implementation: in Chisinau (022) 23 83 84, in Balti (0231) 2 33 30, in Cahul (0 299) 3 22 50, in Causeni (0 243) 2 76 16, (0 243) 2 76 17, in Comrat (0 298) 2 49 82, (0 298) 2 25 68. The "Free legal assistance in electoral disputes" Project was supported by the Eurasia Foundation with the financial support of the Swedish Agency for International Development and Cooperation (SIDA) and the United States Agency for Development (USAID). | Assistance in electoral disputes | Legislation | Project implemented | |
2016-09-01 | (Română) Asistenţă juridică gratuită în litigiile electorale | Legislation | Project implemented | ||
2014-07-01 | (Română) Monitorizarea implementării noilor proceduri de selecţie şi evaluare a performanţelor judecătorilor | Monitoring | Project implemented | ||
2014-03-03 | (Română) Noi soluţii şi abordări în combaterea corupţiei | Information and advice, Legislation | Project implemented | ||
2013-06-01 | Mission of the project: Through the Project “Vulnerability expertise of normative acts in terms of human rights” it will be performed the expertise of legislation of the Republic of Moldova in terms of human rights, which will allow:
Project expected results include:
Activities:
Training scope is to create capacities for human rights expertise performing through CAPC experts’ familiarization with Guide to perform vulnerability expertise of drafts normative acts in terms of human rights and e-template.
The experts will conduct vulnerability expertise of drafts normative acts in terms of human rights of the distributed draft normative acts using the electronic template.
Press conferences will be organized in order to inform the media and the public about important evolutions in the legislation, emerging through the promotion of new draft laws in Parliament. At these press conferences, the important risks of promoting defective laws will be outlined and their impact for the population will be explained.
Press releases will be made as frequently as found necessary to inform the public on the stakes of the emerging legislation (once every two weeks). At the end of the project, a final roundtable with representatives of the Parliament, governmental authorities, media, civil society and other representatives from the legal community will be held in order to announce the effectiveness of the vulnerability expertise of drafts normative acts in terms of human rights mechanism used by the CAPC in 2013-2014. The main purpose of the roundtable will be to summarize the achievements of vulnerability expertise of drafts normative acts in terms of human rights in 2013-2014. Vulnerability expertise of normative acts in terms of human rights is carried out by CAPC through the Project “Vulnerability expertise of normative acts in terms of human rights”, financial supported by Civil Rights Defenders from Sweden. | Vulnerability expertise of normative acts in terms of human rights | Expertise | Project implemented | |
2014-02-15 | (Română) Expertiza coruptibilităţii proiectelor actelor legislative | Expertise | Project implemented | ||
2011-10-18 | The low level of society trust in justice and quasi-general perception of corruption advanced level in justice sector, according to Justice Sector Reform Strategy for 2011-2016 (hereinafter - JSRS), are some of the determinant factors of the reforms in justice sector. The citizens trust level in justice is considered as a litmus paper that reflects the society mood and its attitude towards justice. The most alarming conclusion was made by Public Policies Institute in May 2011 when it was established that only 1% of questioned citizens answered that they fully trust in justice, while 42% affirmed that they do not have any trust in justice. Prevention and combating corruption in judicial system represent the priority objectives in reforming the system. In fact, one of the expected results of the JSRS is an equitable justice sector, qualitative, with zero tolerance towards corruption that would ensure the state durable development and would meet the individuals’ needs. Or corruption in justice affects the most important social values, giving the fact that judicial system is precisely designed to ensure the rule of law respecting, an indispensable requirement for state of law. Project Goal: The Project’s Goal is tosupport authorities’ efforts related to enhancing the integrity of justice sector. Project Objectives: The Project’s Objectives are:
Activities: Activity no. 1: Study on Tools and Strategies to Prevent and Combat Corrupt Practices in Justice Sector
Activity no. 2: Study on Voluntary Polygraph Testing of Justice Sector Officials
This project is funded by the Embassy of the United States of America in Moldova | Solutions for an incorruptible justice | Legislation | Project implemented | |
2005-10-18 | Currently, the Republic of Moldova is part to a set of conventions in the field of human rights. Unfortunately, this fact does not represent itself an effective guarantee of human rights, as long as legislation is not harmonized to the rigors of international treaties and to the various international institutions’ recommendations. Project objective: Developing an efficient tool for checking the compliance of draft laws with international human rights treaties ratified by the Republic of Moldova. Through the project “Developing tools to perform legislation expertise in terms of human rights and gender equality” it will be developed:
Target group represents: whole society, because of project results will benefit all people, as a result of creating conditions for adopting a concordant legislation with human rights and gender equality exigencies. Expected results are: an efficient tool for identifying and eliminating legislative and regulatory reasons that favours appearance, perpetuation and increasing situations of human rights violation and gender equality. Project implementation will directly contribute to create necessary conditions for:
Activities:
In order to ensure a diversity of opinions it will be engaged a group of 5 persons (including practicients), specialized in: legal technique, human rights, ECHR jurisprudence. The Guide will include in particular the methodology on performing expertise, the international conventions in the field of human rights and gender equality, which it has ratified the Republic of Moldova, the relevant national legislative acts, the national and ECHR jurisprudence, the key elements that the expert has to analyse, the particularities of the gender equality expertise of the legislative acts, the expertise stages, etc.
E-template algorithm will be designed (by 2 persons who participated to the Guide elaboration) based on the Guide and taking into account the CAPC experience in the field of corruption proofing expertise. The algorithm will represent the base of the e-template developing (designing). III. E-template on performing expertise designing Designing (programming) e-template and its posting on informational architecture of CAPC’ site will be made by a specialized Company in developing informational products.
During roundtable it will be presented the Guide on performing the legislative expertise from the perspective of human rights and the e-template. Guests of round table will be CAPC experts, UNDP/UN Women representatives, Parliament officials and specialized NGOs in the field of human rights. Creating conditions to eliminate norms that could generate situations of non-respecting human rights, of non-discrimination on any criteria is implemented by the Centre for the Analysis and Prevention of Corruption (CAPC) within the framework of “Developing tools to perform legislation expertise in terms of human rights and gender equality” project supported by the Civil Rights Defenders from Sweden. | Developing tools to perform legislation expertise in terms of human rights and gender equality | Legislation | Project implemented | |
2012-02-01 | (Română) Participă şi tu la reforma justiţiei! | Information and advice | Project implemented | ||
2004-01-01 | The project “Transparency of Justice and Increasing Judges’ Responsibility" was an initiative of the Centre for Analysis and Prevention of Corruption, with the financial support of the Soros Foundation Moldova, through the Law Programme. This project was launched in October 2004 and continued until April 2005. As a pilot project in the Republic of Moldova, it carries out the monitoring of the justice system, through verification of observance of the public trial principle, promoting the transparency of courts. In other words, the project tested the ability of the Moldovan justice to open the doors of the courtroom for regular citizens willing to attend a trial. The project was a novelty in ensuring the transparency of justice administration and had the following Immediate objectives:
Long-term objectives:
The project "Transparency of Justice and Increasing Judges’ Responsibility", established the first monitoring of the justice system in the Republic of Moldova, which helped to review the observance of the public trial principle, promoting in an innovative way the application of this principle, and namely by publishing:
Observance of public trial principle integrates the monthly information regarding the access granted by judges to people willing to attend a trial. On-line trials offer the visitors of the site the unique chance to „attend” a trial carried out in Moldovan courts during the implementation of the project. After each on-line trial, the visitors of the site have the possibility to express their opinion and to see the opinion of other people with respect to the way the trial is carried out, the quality of justice administration etc. The final monitoring results can be found in the Study by the CAPC. November 2004The number of monitored trials - 100 , of which, 96 – public trials and 4 – closed trials. Of all the trials declared public (96), the principle of public trial was applied in 92 cases. The alleged reasons, for which the public trial was not possible, even if the trial was declared public, were:
Of the total number of the trials declared public, when the public trial principle was observed (92), unconditional admission of people occurred in 64 cases. Judges’ comments in relation to people’s requests to attend the trial:
Other comments:
Other findings:
Of the total number of trials declared closed (4), the motivated decision was adopted in 2 cases, at the time of declaring the trial closed. Reasons invoked in the decision were:
In 2 cases, where there was no motivated decision when the trial was declared closed, the judge refused to provide a reason for declaring the trial closed.
December 2004The number of monitored trials - 116, of which, 110 – public trials and 6 – closed trials. Of the total number of trials declared public (110), the public trial principle was applied in 95 cases. Reasons invoked to justify the impossibility to apply the public trial principle, even if the trial was declared public were as follows:
From the total number of trials declared public, when the public trial principle was applied (95), the unconditioned admission of the public was operated in 77 cases. Judges’ comments in relation to people’s requests to attend the trial:
Other comments: During the session, the judge emphasized that the trial is public, when the parties tried to "attack” the assisting person.
Other findings:
Sometimes, judges perceive others’ request to attend a trial as an intentional interference with their activity. Of the total number of trials declared closed (6), the motivated decision was adopted in 2 cases, at the time of declaring the trial closed. Reasons invoked in the decision were:
In 4 cases where there was no motivated decision when the trial was declared closed, the judges’ reasons for the closed trial were:
Observing the privacy of adoption. January 2005The number of monitored trials – 108, of which 106 - public trials and 2 - closed trials. Of all the trials declared public (106), the publicity principle was applied in 101 cases. Reasons for which the application of the publicity principle is not possible, even if the trial is declared public, were:
Of all the trials declared public where the principle of publicity was observed (101), unconditional admission of people occurred in 94 cases. Judges’ comments in relation to people’s requests to attend the trial:
Of all the trials declared public (106) where the principle of publicity was applied (101), in 7 cases the access of the public was conditioned by the judge’s formulation of the following questions / requests:
Other findings:
Of the total number of trials declared closed (2), a motivated decision was taken in 0 cases, when the trial was declared closed. In 2 cases where there was no motivated decision at the time of declaring the trial closed, the reasons brought by judges for holding a closed hearing were:
Other findings:
February 2005The number of monitored trials - 96, of which all 96 were public trials. Of all the trials declared public (96), the principle of publicity was applied in 96 cases. Of all the trials declared public where the principle of publicity was applied (96), unconditional admission of people occurred in 92 cases. Judges’ comments in relation to people’s requests to attend the trial:
Of all the trials declared public (96) where the principle of publicity was applied, in 4 cases the access of public was conditioned by the judge’s formulation of the following questions / requests:
Other findings:
Parties in the trial do not always understand people’s attendance of a trial, although it is public, which shows the society’s ignorance of a simple principle like publicity of the trial. | Transparency of justice | Expertise, Monitoring | Project implemented | |
2014-10-15 | (Română) Southeast Europe Leadership for Development and Integrity (SELDI) | Expertise, Monitoring | Project implemented | ||
2019-10-15 | (Română) Centrul de Asistenţă a Consumatorilor din regiunea Centru | Information and advice | Project implemented | ||
2019-11-01 | (Română) „Ajutorul social în Republica Moldova: între eficacitate și integritate” | Monitoring | Project implemented | ||
2018-06-01 | (Română) Promovarea votului informat şi conştient la alegerile parlamentare prin campania de monitorizare şi informare „Pentru un Parlament curat 2018 | Monitoring | Current project |
Prima CAPC Projects